Mana Crypt
Thursday, July 1st, 2010I have made my distaste for this card known on many occasions however I stand here now with my foot in my mouth. I did a little reasearch at http://magiccards.info and found something slightly disturbing. But before I go into that I’d like to touch on why I felt the way I did about it before:
- The card is a “media insert”. What does that mean? I don’t know really know except that is has never been printed in any block or core set.
- IMO it plays almost on par to Black Lotus which is the best mana accellerant printed to date. While it may not give colored mana, the Lotus is often used as colorless anyways plus Crypt persists and untaps every turn.
- It is strictly better then Sol Ring the first turn it’s played.
- The expected value of the damage you take each upkeep is only 1.5. That’s not much. Mana Vault, for the same acceleration and does not untap, gives you 1 damage each turn and becomes equivilant in acceleration 1 turn later then Mana Crypt.
Given the above points I’ve been pushing to remove Mana Crypt from the cube. Until now. I was bored at work so I thought I’d try and dig up some dirt on our old friend the Crypt to get some hardnosed analytical reason why it shouldn’t be in the cube. What did I find you ask? The most blatant reason why it has to be included.
Mana Crypt is Restricted in Vintage! (for a list of restricted / banned cards go here: http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=judge/resources/sfrvintage)
That makes it no different then Black Lotus or even Brainstorm believe it or not.
What does this mean? I’ll shut up about my distaste for Mana Crypt and start drafting that mofo like there’s no tomorrow. See you all on Friday for draft!
Steve
